Source-rock petrophysics as a step of the interpretation, not a bolt-on
Total organic carbon and kerogen volume computed between shale volume and porosity, so the porosity models subtract the kerogen, net pay can cut on richness, and the zone table carries TOC and gas in place into Volumetrics.
Shale and tight plays fail on conventional workflows in a specific way: kerogen reads as porosity on the density log, uranium reads as clay on the gamma ray, and TOC is estimated in a side tool that nothing downstream can see. The organic-matter step fixes the order of operations. It runs after Vsh, reuses the shale points you already picked, hands the kerogen volume to the porosity models, and puts TOC, organic-rich thickness and Langmuir gas in place on the same zone summation that feeds Volumetrics. Everything runs in the browser on a project folder you choose; well log files never leave your computer.
The organic-matter step is part of Formation Evaluation and is included from the Starter plan, with the adsorbed-gas term in Volumetrics. See pricing
Two source rocks read from the delta-log-R separation, a tight carbonate between them flagged rather than booked, and 54 core plugs calibrating the fused curve. Captured from the app on a synthetic well.
What the step computes
Every estimator is a continuous curve along the well, and the fused answer says how much to trust it at each depth:
Passey delta-log-R on the sonic, density and neutron overlays, with the level of organic metamorphism from Ro, Tmax or a maturity profile fitted to core
Schmoker density deficit against an organic-free density that follows the clay volume, plus a uranium regression from spectral gamma ray
NMR-density deficit and a measured TOC log where you have them, all fused with validity weights: the overlays lose weight in gas zones, tight rock and over-mature section, the density methods drop out in bad hole
A per-depth confidence curve and a reason flag beside the TOC, so a low value is never silently one method's bias
Kerogen volume from TOC, maturity and kerogen type, written as a curve the porosity workspace reads automatically
Passey overlay tracks that rescale each porosity log onto the resistivity and shade the separation, so what is being read is visible on the log, not implied
Calibrate to core, then carry it forward
Import core TOC, Rock-Eval and vitrinite reflectance and the workspace crossplots each estimator against it: the delta-log-R slope gives the maturity, the density trend gives the organic-free and kerogen densities, the uranium trend gives its regression, and the fused curve takes a linear calibration you can see the residuals of. A maturity dialog fits Ro against depth so deep source rocks are not read at the shallow maturity, charts HI against Tmax for kerogen type, and shows the S1 over TOC oil crossover. Excluded points stay excluded across every fit. The calibrated parameters go into the interpretation, so the uncertainty panel re-samples them through porosity, saturation and net pay rather than around the TOC alone.
Downstream, without re-typing
Porosity: the density, neutron and sonic models subtract the kerogen from the matrix at every sample, so a 14 pu shale with kerogen reads as the 6 pu of pore space it actually has
Vsh: a computed gamma ray (GR minus 8.09 times uranium) as the shale indicator, so uranium bound to organic matter is not counted as clay
Net pay: a TOC cut-off beside the Vsh, porosity and Sw cut-offs, and richness classes on every zone
Zone table: average TOC, organic-rich thickness, TOC times thickness, and Langmuir adsorbed plus free gas in place per section, with temperature and ash corrections and pressure from a gradient or your RFT points
Volumetrics: the bridge carries the adsorbed gas content into the deck, where the engine books it on the bulk rock volume beside the free gas, in the deterministic run and in Monte Carlo
Geomechanics: Rickman elastic brittleness from the model's own moduli and a mineralogical index from solver volumes, for the completion conversation
No. It is a step of the deterministic interpretation route in Formation Evaluation, between Vsh and porosity, switched on per case. A conventional well never sees it. It is included from Starter, and the adsorbed-gas term in Volumetrics comes with it.
What do I need for it to be worth running?
Resistivity, sonic or density, and gamma ray give you Passey. Spectral gamma ray adds the uranium method, and density adds Schmoker. Core TOC with Rock-Eval or vitrinite reflectance for at least one well in the play is what makes the maturity and the calibration defensible; without core the workspace says so and runs Passey at the maturity you type.
How does it handle a tight carbonate inside the shale?
A tight, clean carbonate produces a resistivity separation that is not organic matter. The step discounts the overlay methods above a resistivity cap and in gas zones, flags the sample with the reason, and lets you give that zone its own baselines in the parameter table. The synthetic test well carries exactly that trap, and the recovery test checks the carbonate is not booked as source rock.
Does the gas in place double count with Volumetrics?
No. Formation Evaluation reports adsorbed plus free gas per zone for the summation. The bridge carries only the adsorbed gas content to Volumetrics, which computes free gas from its own porosity, saturation and Bg and adds the adsorbed term on the rock volume. Each term is booked once.
Where does brittleness live?
In the geomechanics workspace, where the elastic moduli are. Rickman elastic brittleness comes from the model's static Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio; the mineralogical index (Jarvie, or Wang and Gale with kerogen as ductile) reads the probabilistic solver's mineral volumes when you have run it.
Run a source rock through the whole chain
Load a shale well from a folder on your machine, switch on source-rock mode, calibrate to core, and carry TOC and gas in place to Volumetrics without re-typing a number. Included from Starter.