Geomechanics

1D mechanical earth model, built from the logs you already have

Turn sonic and density curves into a calibrated wellbore stability answer: elastic properties, overburden, pore pressure, rock strength, horizontal stresses, and the safe mud weight window, computed in your browser, on well data that never leaves your machine.

Geomechanics runs as a compute mode inside the Formation Evaluation workspace, so it reads the same LAS and DLIS curves, depth reference, zones, and unit system as the rest of your interpretation. Outputs are written back as depth curves you can plot in the log viewer, overlay against calibration points, and export with the case.

Geomechanics is part of Formation Evaluation and is included from the Starter plan. Projects save to a folder on your computer and do not count toward Starter's cloud saved-case limit. See pricing

The Geomechanics workspace with a well loaded: log tracks of overburden, pore pressure and horizontal stresses beside a mud weight window plot, showing the safe drilling corridor between 7,800 and 8,800 ft.
Geomechanics on RRS-1 EAGLE, 7,800–8,800 ft at a 0.5 ft sample rate, 2,001 mud-window samples. The shaded corridor is the safe window: floored by pore pressure and collapse, capped by the minimum horizontal stress. A synthetic well, so nothing here is client data.

What the model produces

Every output is a continuous curve along the wellbore, computed sample by sample from your input logs:

  • Shear slowness (DTS): measured, or synthesized with Castagna mudrock or Greenberg–Castagna when no shear log exists
  • Dynamic and static elastic properties: Poisson's ratio and Young's modulus, with a configurable dynamic-to-static factor
  • Overburden stress (Sv): density integrated from surface, with water depth and mudline handling for offshore wells
  • Pore pressure: Eaton (sonic or resistivity) or Bowers, including unloading, with normal compaction trends you can fit to your own data
  • Rock strength: unconfined compressive strength and internal friction angle, plus tensile strength as a fraction of UCS
  • Horizontal stresses: poroelastic Shmin and SHmax with tectonic strain terms
  • Mud weight window: minimum weight against shear collapse and maximum weight against tensile breakdown, in ppg EMW
  • Sanding onset: critical bottomhole flowing pressure (CBHFP) for completion and drawdown screening

Published methods, named in the interface

Nothing is a black box. You pick the correlation, you see the parameters, and the reference is on screen:

  • Pore pressure: Eaton (sonic), Eaton (resistivity), and Bowers with optional unloading behaviour
  • Shear synthesis: Castagna mudrock and Greenberg–Castagna by lithology (sandstone, limestone, dolomite, shale)
  • Rock strength: McNally for sandstone, Horsrud for shale, Golubev & Rabinovich for carbonate, and Lal for friction angle
  • Stress state: poroelastic horizontal stress with tectonic strains, plus Kirsch hoop stresses with a Mohr–Coulomb collapse criterion and tensile breakdown

Pore pressure methods in the workspace

  • Eaton (sonic)
  • Eaton (resistivity)
  • Bowers (sonic)

UCS correlations in the workspace

  • McNally: sandstone (Δt)
  • Horsrud: shale (Vp)
  • Golubev & Rabinovich: carbonate (Δt)

Calibrate against real measurements

A model that has not been calibrated is a guess. Import RFT/MDT formation pressure points as CSV and overlay them on the computed pore pressure curve, add LOT and FIT points in ppg EMW to check the fracture gradient, and fit the sonic or resistivity normal compaction trend directly to your own shale intervals instead of accepting a default.

Deviated and horizontal wells

Vertical-well shortcuts break down as soon as the well builds angle. Switch the wellbore to deviated and the far-field stress tensor is rotated into borehole coordinates using inclination, well azimuth, and SHmax azimuth (per-sample survey data overrides the constants where you have it), so the mud weight window reflects the trajectory you are actually drilling.

Stress polygon

At any depth you choose, the Zoback stress polygon shows which stress regimes are frictionally admissible for your overburden, pore pressure, and friction coefficient, with your computed Shmin and SHmax plotted inside it. It is the fastest way to sanity-check whether a stress model is physically possible before anyone drills on it.

Your well data stays on your machine

Geomechanics inherits the Formation Evaluation local-first model. Logs, cases, and computed curves live in a project folder you choose on your computer through the browser File System Access API. We do not store well log files or interpretation cases in our database, and the geomechanics computation itself runs entirely in your browser.

Where teams use it

Well planning and mud weight design

Build the pre-drill mud weight window from offset well logs, then narrow it as calibration points arrive.

Wellbore stability review

Explain breakouts and losses after the fact by comparing the drilled mud weight against modelled collapse and breakdown pressures.

Completion and sanding risk

Screen drawdown limits with the sanding CBHFP curve before committing to a completion design.

Overpressure detection

Track pore pressure against the normal compaction trend to see where a section departs from hydrostatic.

How it fits your interpretation

  1. 1.Load LAS or DLIS logs into Formation Evaluation and set the depth reference and units
  2. 2.Open Compute → Geomechanics (1D MEM) and map DTC, DTS, RHOB, and resistivity curves
  3. 3.Choose the pore pressure method and fit the normal compaction trend to your shale points
  4. 4.Import RFT/MDT and LOT/FIT calibration points and adjust parameters until the model honours them
  5. 5.Set the wellbore trajectory, review the mud weight window and stress polygon, and commit curves back to the well

Geomechanics questions

Do I need a shear sonic log to run a mechanical earth model?

No. If a DTS curve is present it is used directly. Where it is missing, shear slowness is synthesized from compressional slowness using the Castagna mudrock relation or Greenberg–Castagna with a lithology you select (sandstone, limestone, dolomite, or shale), and the synthesized curve is labelled as such so nobody mistakes it for a measurement.

Which pore pressure prediction methods are supported?

Eaton from sonic, Eaton from resistivity, and Bowers from sonic with optional unloading for exhumed or unloaded sections. Normal compaction trends can be fitted to your own shale intervals rather than left at library defaults, and predicted pressure can be overlaid against imported RFT/MDT points.

Does the mud weight window account for well deviation?

Yes. In deviated mode the far-field stress tensor is rotated into borehole coordinates using well inclination, well azimuth, and SHmax azimuth, with per-sample survey data taking precedence over constant values. Collapse and breakdown pressures are then solved around the inclined borehole rather than assuming a vertical well.

How is rock strength estimated?

Unconfined compressive strength comes from a log correlation you choose: McNally for sandstone, Horsrud for shale, or Golubev & Rabinovich for carbonate. Internal friction angle is either a constant you set or derived from compressional velocity using Lal, and tensile strength is taken as a configurable fraction of UCS.

Is geomechanics a separate product or part of the platform?

It is a compute mode inside the Formation Evaluation workspace, included from the Starter plan alongside the rest of Formation Evaluation. There is no separate geomechanics licence, and results share the same case file, unit system, and export path as your petrophysical interpretation.

Does my well data get uploaded to run the model?

No. The geomechanics computation runs in your browser and the project folder lives on your computer. Well log files and interpretation cases are not stored in our database. DLIS conversion is the one server round-trip on the platform, and the uploaded file is not retained.

Geomechanics is one of the compute modes inside Formation Evaluation, alongside multimineral solving, permeability estimation, saturation-height modelling, pressure analysis, and synthetic seismograms.

Back to home